Building applications with JavaScript/TypeScript as the backbone

We use JavaScript and TypeScript for almost everything: frontend, backend, APIs, tooling and infrastructure scripts. It is not a matter of taste. It is the fastest way to put a product in users’ hands with a team you can actually hire.

Marco MendãoCo-Founder & CTO · 9 min

We have worked with Python, Java and PHP. But when a startup needs an MVP fast, or a traditional company needs to modernise without hiring several specialised teams, a unified stack almost always wins.

Fast deployment

  • Platforms like Vercel and Netlify deploy Next.js apps on every commit, with no servers to set up.
  • NestJS backends containerise cleanly and run on any cloud with standard CI/CD pipelines.
  • Per-pull-request preview environments let clients review changes before they reach production.

Frameworks that scale: Next.js and NestJS

On the frontend, Next.js gives us server rendering, static generation, React Server Components and API routes for simple logic. On the backend, NestJS brings an architecture organised into modules, controllers and services, first-class typing and support for REST, GraphQL, WebSockets and message queues.

This combination also helps us break monoliths into modular services: frontend and backend evolve independently but share the language and type definitions.

Full-stack teams that cost less

  • One developer can own a whole feature: query, endpoint, component and deploy.
  • Shared types between frontend and backend eliminate a whole class of integration bugs.
  • Smaller teams mean a lower burn rate for startups.
  • Onboarding is faster because there is only one stack to learn.

Community and talent

npm has over two million packages for authentication, payments, analytics, PDFs or AI integrations. The documentation for Next.js, NestJS, React and Node.js is extensive and maintained. A large community lowers project risk: niche stacks tend to fade.

Portugal has a strong and growing base of JS/TS developers, from universities, bootcamps or self-taught. That makes it easier to hire, scale and, later, bring the team in-house on the same stack.

Responsive, dynamic applications

React’s component model keeps complex interfaces manageable, and Progressive Web Apps deliver an app-like experience from the browser, without app stores.

Example: Coach IDCoach ID is a PWA built on this stack. Coaches use it on their phone on the pitch, on desktop at the office and on a tablet during training, with no separate native builds.

One stack, many contexts

Data science, embedded systems or high-frequency trading need specialised tools. But for web apps, SaaS platforms, marketplaces and internal tools, JS/TS remains the strongest default.

The right question is not which language is most elegant. It is which one gets the product to users fastest, with a team you can hire, on a platform that scales.
Marco Mendão
written byMarco MendãoCo-founder and CTO at Betacode. Writes about architecture, product engineering and using the right technology to ship faster.
// next step

Want to apply this to your project?

Tell us what you are building and we will talk about the best approach.

Talk to us Estimate price

Keep reading

All insights →
Engineering8 min
How AI can help you create your next projectRead article →
Engineering11 min
How to transform legacy software into a modern productRead article →